[R6RS] Backward compatibility
Matthew Flatt
mflatt
Tue Jan 20 08:08:34 EST 2004
At Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:24:51 -0500, Marc Feeley wrote:
> One issue that we should address now is backward compatibility. In
> the process of designing R6RS, should we consider changes that would
> not be backward compatible? That is, should we consider changes that
> would cause some R5RS programs to not work anymore in an R6RS
> compliant system?
>
> My position is that R6RS need not be backward compatible.
I agree.
Matthew
More information about the R6RS
mailing list