[R6RS] SYNTAX-CASE

[Manuel Serrano]

> Does anyone object to voting on syntax-case?  If there are no
> objections by tomorrow evening we'll put it up for a vote.
> 
> Overall I like syntax-case so I will vote in favour.  The things I
> dislike are identifier-syntax (I would prefer that functionality to
> be integrated into syntax-case), and that syntax-case can match
> non-syntax objects (but Kent's latest proposal has fixed this).
> 
> I wish however I could have more experience with using syntax-case.
> I tried integrating the portable implementation into Gambit, but
> I still can't figure out how to get source-code correlation to work.
> Kent, if you have some pointers that would be greatly appreciated.
Voting on SYNTAX-CASE, as it is now? If this is what you mean, I imagine
that there is no more need for me to work on an alternative pattern matching
proposal...

-- 
Manuel