[R6RS] Table proposal

[Michael Sperber]

Marc Feeley <feeley at iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> What about the additional features supported by the table proposal,
> i.e. weak-keys and weak-values,

This is fine and important to have eventually.  However, if we have
weakness at this level and eq? tables, shouldn't we also offer more
fundamental facilities that can explain their semantics?  I'm thinking
of ephemerons and stable names.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla