[R6RS] Timeline for R6RS SRFIs

[Marc Feeley]

On 2-Jun-05, at 10:14 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:

> Sure, but note that we never said we'd *only* cover the minimal
> requirements.  This was mainly in the interest of saving time and
> work.  Given that a lot of the work has already been done, it's not
>

It is not mainly about saving time and work.  It is mainly about  
reaching consensus in the limited time we have left.  A big proposal  
(such as SRFI 68) is bound to be more controversial than a small one.

Marc