[R6RS] Timeline for R6RS SRFIs

[Michael Sperber]

"Manuel Serrano" <Manuel.Serrano at sophia.inria.fr> writes:

>> Why don't the R6RS people raise their concerns about the imperative
>> layer only at this point---once we'll get that done, we can decide
>> how to move on.
> I'm not in favor of changing the whole Scheme IO system. I think that
> 90% of the features you would like to add to Scheme with SRFI 66 could
> be more or less obtained by adding "procedure ports" (ports that
> invoke a procedure when read is invoked). 

That doesn't scale, and is much harder than you seem to think.

I generally don't understand how your comment relates to the statement
of mine that you quote.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla