[R6RS] Re: smaller condition hierarchy

[Matthew Flatt]

At Sun, 06 Aug 2006 10:50:22 +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> 
> Matthew had this:
> 
> > Moved &undefined to a sub-condition of &defect, and dropped
> >   &syntax. (If we need &syntax after all, I don't think &undefined
> >   should be a sub-condition.)
> 
> What should, say, a macro transformer raise if it encounters a syntax
> error?

Sounds like we need &syntax.

Matthew