[R6RS] Ticket Status as of svn repository revision 1196:

[Michael Sperber]

dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:

> 73: This still needs to be decided.
> [...]
>     I propose that we adopt the following response:
>
>       The next draft report will suggest a convention (not requirement)
>       that users construct UIDs either from library and record-type names
>       or from names constructed using the UUID namespace.

That is beside the point of Jaffer's comment.  See the response
draft.  Do you disagree with the response?

> 80: This still needs to be decided
>
>     I propose the following response: [...]

OK. (Replacing "simple-i/o" by "(r6rs i/o simple)".)

> 129: We have agreement to accept the formal comment, but still need to
>      decide on the syntax:
>
>        Option 1: (nongenerative #t) 
>          - with (nongenerative #f) or the absense of a nongenerative clause
>            implying generative
>
>        Option 2: (nongenerative)
>          - with the absense of a nongenerative clause implying generative
>
>      I propose option 2.

OK.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla