[R6RS] the response to formal comment #75 has a problem

[Michael Sperber]

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> I don't understand the response to formal comment #75.
>
> In particular, the proposed (make-condition type alist)
> procedure seems to have a problem when several fields
> of the type have the same name, as can occur through
> inheritance 

That's prohibited.  The spec for `make-condition-type' says:

  Field-names must be disjoint from the field names of
  parent and its ancestors. 

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla