[R6RS] library syntax
William D Clinger
will at ccs.neu.edu
Tue Jul 25 12:26:56 EDT 2006
Kent wrote:
> Here's a revision of the library syntax proposal. Only the <export-spec>
> syntax and associated note about phasihg is new.
Some minor comments:
I think we approved a (define <variable>) syntax.
Shouldn't it be allowed in library bodies?
The productions for <import-set> refer to <X-set>,
for which there are no productions.
Where it says "indirect-export forms would be ignored
except within a library <body>", I think the last two
words should be changed to "<library body>".
Will
More information about the R6RS
mailing list