[R6RS] summary of decisions regarding multiple values

[dyb at cs.indiana.edu]

> > Not exactly.  The traditional CPS form of (lambda () (f (g))) is
> > (lambda (k) (g (lambda (v) (f v k)))).
>
> The proper translation of that CPS-transform into
> Scheme is (lambda (k) (g (lambda v (apply f k v)))).

Under your proposal, this won't toss the extra values returned by g, will
it?  Won't f complain about receiving the wrong number of arguments?

Kent