[R6RS] List library vs. core
Anton van Straaten
anton at appsolutions.com
Sun Jun 25 23:10:32 EDT 2006
William D Clinger wrote:
> Mike wrote:
>
>>We decided we would put the new list procedures into a separate
>>library. Right now, it looks a bit inconsistent because the whole set
>>of remp, remove, remv, remq is in that library, but only assp and memp
>>of the assoc- and member-related sets, where the rest currently
>>resides in the core. I suggest that we also move memq, memv, and
>>member, assq, assv, and assoc to the list library....
>
>
> That is what I would prefer.
I've made this change to draft/corelib/library-contents.html in svn.
More information about the R6RS
mailing list