[R6RS] multiple-value binding

[Matthew Flatt]

At Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:25:02 -0500, dyb at cs.indiana.edu wrote:
> I'd like to revive the multiple-value binding discussion.  I believe
> there have been three basic proposals for a multiple-value binding form,
> which I've identified as 1, 2, and 3 below.  To that I'm adding a fourth.

My preference is 1 > 4 > 3 > 2.

My only strong opinion is against 2, because it's too subtle.

Matthew