[R6RS] Semantics of `raise'

[Michael Sperber]

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> I still think the textual description of raise-continuable
> in my previous message is the intended semantics.

Absolutely.  I believe what you said explicitly was implicit (but
unambigous) in my version, but in any case we agree.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla