[R6RS] ->inexact and ->exact

[Michael Sperber]

dyb at cs.indiana.edu writes:

> If we do figure out how to add identifiers that start with -> to the
> language, should we rename exact->inexact to ->inexact and inexact->exact
> to ->exact?  It's always seemed funny that exact->inexact allows inexact
> inputs and inexact->exact allows exact inputs.

Fine with me.  It certainly confused the Scheme 48 implementors and
users for the longest time.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla