[R6RS] Merge `put-string-n' into `put-string'?

[Michael Sperber]

Here's a post on r6rs-discuss that probably should have been a formal
comment:

http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2007-March/001774.html

> Ken Friedenbach kenliz at cruzio.com 
> Sat Mar 3 12:18:19 EST 2007 
> 
> Previous message: [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination? 
> Next message: [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations 
> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 
> In Library section 7.2.12 are both put-string and put-string-n  
> necessary? It seems these two procedures could be combined, since put- 
> string as described is identical to put-string-n with both start and  
> count default values.
> 
> I recommend just defining put-string with the parameters and default  
> values of put-string-n.

I recommend accepting this proposal.  Any objections?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla