[R6RS] Including record-type name in nongenerative uid

[R. Kent Dybvig]

> > We are ambivalent about this but will study the proposal and make a
> > decision by the time the next report draft is released.
>
> I move that we accept this part of the proposal.

In the interest of moving forward to a vote, I will second Mike's motion.

I vote no.  I'll assume Mike votes yes unless I hear otherwise.  Will?
Matthew?  Anton?

Kent