[R6RS] incomplete draft of revised i/o

[Michael Sperber]

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

> It could be that Mike is trying to say that SRFI-81
> was powerful enough to implement string ports as
> they were specified in SRFI-81, but is not claiming
> that SRFI-81 was powerful enough to implement string
> ports as they are specified in 5.91 and 5.92.

Exactly.  It boils down to the `get-output-xxx' procedures, which the
R6RS drafts have but SRFI 81 does not.  SRFI 81 (combined with SRFI
79) doesn't allow a straightforward implementation of it (which is
precisely why it's missing), but the magical mystery procedure does,
which is why I like it.

Sorry for being unclear.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla