[R6RS] Empty `case' and `cond' expressions?

[Michael Sperber]

"R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb at cs.indiana.edu> writes:

>> We did it for `case-lambda', shouldn't we do it for `case' and `cond' as
>> well?
>
> I wouldn't mind, but the situation is not entirely analogous, 

Could you say why?

> so I don't think we need to do so just for the sake of consistency.

By my mind, it's less for consistency, than for simplification purposes.
(Jonathan Rees alerted me to this, who wasn't even aware of the
discussion regarding `case-lambda'.)

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla