[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records

[Michael Sperber]

Thanks!

William D Clinger <will at ccs.neu.edu> writes:

>> More generally, we say right now that even immutable pairs, vectors, and
>> strings denote storage locations: In the light of the above, shouldn't
>> we also make adjustments here to make them the same as immutable
>> records?
>
> That was a mistake that was put into the R5RS at the
> insistence of the rabble.  You are certainly free to
> make the same mistake in the R6RS.

Just to be sure I understand what you're saying: Which one's the
mistake?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla