[R6RS] `eqv?' on immutable records

[Michael Sperber]

"R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb at cs.indiana.edu> writes:

> Based on the notes I've seen from Will, Mike, and Anton, however, the
> concensus appears to be against me.  Since time is short, if no support
> for my "all compound objects have location tags" position materializes in
> the next 24 hours or so, I suggest we move ahead with the "all mutable
> compound objects have location tags, but immutable compound objects may or
> may not have location tags" position.

Thank you.  This has been done in revision 1699.  You might want to
check the details.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla