[r6rs-discuss] Compile-time detection of contract violations

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Wed Nov 1 04:26:41 2006

Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum_at_cs.indiana.edu> writes:

> Just to make sure we're on the same boat: a syntax violation is
> something like a malformed "if" expression or a lambda with
> duplicate bindings. It is not something like (cons 1 2 3), correct?

Yes.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla

Received on Wed Nov 01 2006 - 04:26:33 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anton van Straaten: "[r6rs-discuss] The definition of flonum is in the wrong place"
Previous message: Michael Sperber: "[r6rs-discuss] Compile-time detection of contract violations"
In reply to: Abdulaziz Ghuloum: "[r6rs-discuss] Compile-time detection of contract violations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:00 UTC