r6rs-discuss.mbox by subject
- Thomas Lord (Tue Jun 26 2007 - 20:15:26 UTC)
- "Unspecified"
- 5.91 Trivial Defect - List utilities - typo in remp example
- [Formal] Add (sort) and (vector-sort!) procedures
- [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations
- [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations (Sam TH)
- [Formal] eq?/eqv? misbehave around NaNs
- [Formal] eq?/eqv? misbehave around NaNs [QNames]
- [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)
- [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful
- [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful]
- [r6rs-discuss] "Compound conditions considered bogus" withdrawn
- [r6rs-discuss] "Treatment of different versions"
- [r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"
- [r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified" (naming)
- [r6rs-discuss] #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
- [r6rs-discuss] #vu8 and syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] &i/o-file-exists-not
- [r6rs-discuss] (no subject)
- [r6rs-discuss] (rnrs r5rs (6))
- [r6rs-discuss] (rnrs) composition seems wrong
- [r6rs-discuss] 5.91 Trivial Defect - List utilities - typo in remp example
- [r6rs-discuss] >= should not act on subversion, but rather version
- [r6rs-discuss] [ANN] Initial release of Ikarus--the compiler of choice for R6RS hackers
- [r6rs-discuss] [ANN] R6RS Libraries and syntax-case (van Tonder) implementation
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "#! /usr/bin/env" is not "portable." It's Unix-specific.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "#! /usr/bin/env" is not "portable." It's Unix-specific. (fwd)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "regular expression": bad wording
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] #;<datum> comments useless
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (eqv? 1+2i 3+4i) should be explicitly #f
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (no subject)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (r6rs base) must also export _ and ... at level 1
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] (r6rs enum) to be dropped
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] ->exact and ->inexact should be renamed
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 3-armed-if Typos
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 5.1. Requirement levels is MAXxed out
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 5.91: LF should not be the only line separator
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 6 digits enough in <hex scalar value>
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] 6 with ring above on p. 122
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] < is inconsistent on NaNs.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] <constituent> excludes characters of category Ll
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] <symbol escape> undefined
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] [OT] #;<datum> comments useless
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] `#\newline' should be reinstated
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Add (sort) and (vector-sort!) procedures
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Add a multi-file library example
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Add bytes-fill! procedure analogous to vector-fill! .
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] add list* or cons*
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Add symbol=? and boolean=?
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow compilers to reject obvious violations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow inline hex escapes anywhere
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow limited comparisons of complex numbers
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie"
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Allow real->single and real->double to convert complex numbers
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow variable-length strings
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Ambiguous call/cc-behaviour of list operations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] An exception might be raised
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Applicable record instances
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] argument names in library section 1.1: char vs. letter
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Arithmetic expressions: missing comma
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] assorted small fixes (spelling, grammar, punctuation, and typo fixes; rephrasing; etc.)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] assorted small fixes and minor suggestions (R5.92RS)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] asymmetry between fold-left and fold-right
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] backslash-linefeed
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Base library needs a name
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Binary and string pseudo-transcoders should die
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bitwise-bit-count should return -ve on -ve argument.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] blame assignment for contract violations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bodies should be more widely permitted.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarations with expressions
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] body should allow mixing declarationswith expressions
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Buffer mode should be specifiable on open-file-input-port
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytes<->vector procedures
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] bytevector aliasing severely impedes optimizations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytevectors: `big' and `little' endianness under-specified
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Bytevectors: Sections 2.5 and 2.6 are inappropriately structured.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] C sharp can pass arguments by reference
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Capitalize "Boolean."
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Change the "add-prefix" import syntax in libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Change the "for" import syntax in libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Clarify the description of which continuations take multiple values
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Clean-up in the additional arithmetic libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Cleaning up make-transcoder's friends
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] combine syntactic record layers
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Compound conditions considered bogus
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Condition hierarchy
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] condition type name convention description error
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Conflating programs and scripts
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing comparison with Pascal call-by-reference
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Confusing formatting in report section 9.16
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] confusion about which bytevectors exist
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] copy/paste error in inexact-make-polar's example
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Correct I/O Interface Inconsistencies
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Datum values, shared structure and eq? vs equal?
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] declarations break lexical scoping
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Declarations do not belong in the report
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Declarations don't seem to be designed for real-world needs
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] defer lambda rather than define rhs when expanding body
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Defun example should actually implement defun
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Delayed evaluation
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Delayed evaluation - detecting reentrancy
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Disallow redefinitions macros/variables
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] div and mod should have examples with x1 negative
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop enumerations library?
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Drop formal semantics of library toplevel
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Dropping enumerations library?
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Dropping rename and add-prefix from libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Eliminate compound library names
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eliminate library export immutability loophole
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Enumeration types should be reified
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eol-style: Explain what the identifier "ls" means.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Eq? and eqv? should apply to all standard objects
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eq?/eqv? misbehave around NaNs
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Equivalence predicate version of memp
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Error in Runge-Kutta example
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] eval needs refining
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Exact-Integer and Real (and Complex) are more useful distinctions than Exact and Inexact.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Exactness is orthogonal to type
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Expand the set of self-evaluating datums
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Extended definition of map and for-each
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] fenders should be dropped from syntax-rules
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] file-opens should be a procedure
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] FIND delivers an ambiguous value
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] floor, ceiling, truncate, and round are unnecessarily over-specified on infinities and NaNs
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall and exists description and examples
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall should be for-all for consistency with for-each
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall, exists -> any, every
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal comment #154 resolution not implemented
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] formal comment (ports, characters, strings, Unicode)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be considered a number, not a real
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal Comment: NaN should be, considered a number, not a real
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Formal semantics should not contain complicating optimizations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Four binding constructs should be six
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] fxlogical-shift-left and fxlogical-shift-right used but not defined.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] get-bytevector-some may be difficult to implement
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] hash-table-mutable? vs hash-table-immutable?
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Hashtable issues
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Have put-datum append atmosphere
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Higher-order procedures should not interfere with exceptions
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] I/O: `call-with-port' and multiple returns
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] I/O: Bytevector output ports and `set-port-position!'
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] identifier macros with syntax-rules
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] identifier-syntax is not a derived form
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Identifiers beginning with "->" considered useless
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Illegal null cases in import syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-dependent transcoders considered harmful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-specific declarations
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementing Common Lisp's defmacro is not straigtforward.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Improve port i/o.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] In <5.6 Naming conventions>, mention the "&" convention for condition types.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] In <field-spec>s of define-record-type, field name should appear first.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Inappropriate number of values should be defined
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] inconsistent punctuation
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] inconsistent use of prefixes: "fixnum-", "fx", and "fl"
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Index missing _
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] inf.0 and nan.0 should remain symbols.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Instances of acos are missing
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Integer division examples should be written in Scheme.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Internal define-syntax lexical scoping violation
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Invoking toplevel undefined
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 (corrected)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] It is not clear what negating 0.0 produces
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] last-element behavior of for-each
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Leave readers and writers out of the report.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Legal libraries cannot be imported
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] letrec* vs. letrec
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Lexemes #vu8( #' #` #, #,_at_ missing
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Lexical determination of phases
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Libraries - minor defect
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Library form should prefix libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Library Section 11.3 "Exact bitwise arithmetic" should cite SRFI-60.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] local imports
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Make unspecified return values of eq? / eqv? unspecified
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Map returning twice
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Max and min with zero arguments
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor "typos" in 20.3
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor error in library example
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor improvement to lisp-transformer
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Minor wording issues
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing procedure make-custom-textual-input/output-port
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in make-record-constructor-descriptor
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Missing word in report section 9.13
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] modified interface to list-sort and vector-sort
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Move real->flonum to the (r6rs arithmetic flonum)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Muliple value expressions in scripts
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] multiple values and tail contexts
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Multiple versions of one library should be linkable
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] NaN is not a real number.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] NaNs are not real numbers
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] need make-custom-textual-input-port and make-custom-textual-output-port
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] No defaults given for sealed and opaque
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Non-ASCII characters should not be treated all alike
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Nonstandard notation for Unicode characters
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] nothing is said to be safe
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] number->string and put-datum have different restrictions for inexact arguments
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Omitted word in last graf of 3.2.2
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] only 'big' and 'little' as endiannness may not be enough
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Phase semantics
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Phrasing in 14. Exceptions and conditions is unclear.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Plausible alists
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Plausible lists presentation defect
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Please give us file-exists? and delete-file.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please make square brackets more useful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] please repair and simplify lexical syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Port predicates
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Position-significance of declarations in scripts
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] preposterous mustard
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Problems in description of instantiation semantics
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] proc in hash-table-update! should not mutate hash-table
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] procedures passed to make-hash-table should not mutate the hash table
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Protocol environment
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Provide a way to define nongenerative records without specifying <uid>
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Provide another formal comment period once the spec has settled down
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] quasiquote freshness
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Quasiquote should support unquotation within bytes objects.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Querying Declaration Quality Priorities
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] R6RS must support UTF-16 encoding
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] raise semantics no longer makes sense
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] raising of exceptions should not be ambiguous or confusing
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rationalize Iteration
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Record layers are not orthogonal.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Record nongenerative UID should be library name where record is defined
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Record-type-length
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Recursive exception handling considered harmful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Reduce over-specification as well as under-specification.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Relax ordering constraint on library bodies
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove DEFINE and BEGIN^F from formal semantics
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove double phase semantics
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove double phase semantics (fwd)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove reference to do in named-let
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Remove the (r6rs when-unless) library
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename bitwise-arithmetic-shift to bitwise-shift etc.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename generate-temporaries to generate-symbols (or generate-identifiers)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename named `let'
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename on export considered harmful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename the unspecified value
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Report section 6.1 needs reordering
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Request for reconsideration (in part) of formal comment #47
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Request for reconsideration of formal comment #11
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Requirement to detect circular lists
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Requirement to detect circular lists - benchmarks
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] returning exception handlers easily trigger infinite loops
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] right shift formula and bit-field signedness
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] scalar value -> Unicode scalar value
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme and Common Lisp are not the only statically-scoped Lisp dialects.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme is not a scripting language.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme should not be changed to be case sensitive.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme should not be changed to be casesensitive.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Scheme-6 should be differentiated from earlier versions
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Script-body differences
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Sending some generic arithmetic procedures to a library
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] separator spaces in dislay/write output
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Shorter record definition
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] should allow quoting non-letters in identifiers
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Simplifying conditions
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Simplifying conditions (fwd)
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI import format
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] SRFI-39 should be made an R6RS library
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] standard-{output, error}-port speaks of input
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] String exit codes should be allowed
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] String operations need more complete specification.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] string output ports
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] String positions and string slices
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Syntactic datums and datum values
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntactic sugar causes cancer of the exports
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntax-case specification
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] syntax-rules should evaluate to a transformer
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] the CHAR? type
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The components of a compound condition should be independent
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] the formal semantics should be a non-normative appendix
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The implicit cond in guard expressions is not a good idea
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The mess around line endings
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The name bytevector should be hyphenated.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] the procedural record layer needs better examples
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The standard-*-port procedures should return a fresh binary port
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] The value of set! et al. is overspecified
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Treatment of literal keywords
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Trivial Enhancement of macros in v5.91: capture-syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] typewriter font nitpick
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "affect" in library section 8.2.2
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "balues" in Appendix E
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo "must all belongs" in library section 14
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo in library example
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Typo in Section 1.5
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] U+0085 is whitespace
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] U+FFFD not intended for encoding errors
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Unclear how equality predicates behave on NaN
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] utf-32-codec is useless
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Vector size in the read syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] verbosity of "fields" specifications for records
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version numbers are broken in 5.91
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Version reference syntax is overly complex.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Versioned names for base libraries considered harmful
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Violation of lexical scoping
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Why are simple conditions so different from records
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] wrong sign function definition
- [r6rs-discuss] [Formal] {real, rational, integer}-valued? procedures need rationale
- [r6rs-discuss] [Fwd: Fwd: Project proposal: Multi-Language VM]
- [r6rs-discuss] [Gtk2hs-devel] C2HS problem
- [r6rs-discuss] [OT] [Was: Allow compilers to reject obvious violations] Should compilers preserve termination?
- [r6rs-discuss] [OT] Should compilers preserve termination?
- [r6rs-discuss] [r6rs] regular expressions and sockets
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Important: Schedule for Registration and Voting on R6RS
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R6RS Errata and Electorate; Voting Schedule
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R6RS Ratified
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] R6RS Released
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Voter registration for R6RS opens; R5.93RS to be released on May 22.
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme Steering Committee announcements] Will Clinger has resigned from the Editors Committee
- [r6rs-discuss] A different take on libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] A suggestion about LETREC
- [r6rs-discuss] About record types
- [r6rs-discuss] Additional Correspondence
- [r6rs-discuss] all that being said (re libraries)
- [r6rs-discuss] an essay on language design
- [r6rs-discuss] and/or error
- [r6rs-discuss] ANN: new version of the portable R6RS library and syntax-case system
- [r6rs-discuss] Appendix B erratum
- [r6rs-discuss] Are both put-string and put-string-n necessary?
- [r6rs-discuss] assorted small fixes (spelling, grammar, punctuation, and typo fixes; rephrasing; etc.)
- [r6rs-discuss] avoiding repetition in library definitions
- [r6rs-discuss] backslash-linefeed indentation
- [r6rs-discuss] base and syntax-case
- [r6rs-discuss] Better diagnostic messages for unmatched parentheses?
- [r6rs-discuss] Binary compatibility?
- [r6rs-discuss] blast 2 (and then i'm done)
- [r6rs-discuss] Bodies and sequences
- [r6rs-discuss] Bug-fixed macros-libraries implementation available
- [r6rs-discuss] bum spec for binary-port?
- [r6rs-discuss] Byte Arrays in the Lexical Syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] Bytevectors
- [r6rs-discuss] Can we get better specs than this?
- [r6rs-discuss] char-numeric? and the unicode "Numeric" property
- [r6rs-discuss] Comment 111: Syntax-rules
- [r6rs-discuss] Comment 92: Phase semantics
- [r6rs-discuss] comment and vote (if allowed)
- [r6rs-discuss] comment and vote (if allowed) (Elf)
- [r6rs-discuss] comment and vote (re-definition)
- [r6rs-discuss] comment period ending March 15
- [r6rs-discuss] Comments on syntax-rules
- [r6rs-discuss] Comparing Strings
- [r6rs-discuss] compilation and portability
- [r6rs-discuss] Compile-time detection of contract violations
- [r6rs-discuss] compilers, design philosophy
- [r6rs-discuss] cond (and friends) must be hygienic?
- [r6rs-discuss] Confused about import version specification "and" and "or"
- [r6rs-discuss] Confusing taxonomy of identifiers
- [r6rs-discuss] Confusion over |p
- [r6rs-discuss] Continuations and expansion
- [r6rs-discuss] Continuations....
- [r6rs-discuss] Correct I/O Interface Inconsistencies
- [r6rs-discuss] Couple of typos/tweaks in 7.1
- [r6rs-discuss] criteria for including or excluding a library
- [r6rs-discuss] Deep copy
- [r6rs-discuss] Description of forall procedure
- [r6rs-discuss] design thumb-axioms for strings
- [r6rs-discuss] displaying a list
- [r6rs-discuss] division by exact 0
- [r6rs-discuss] Does (r6rs syntax-case) export ..., _, set! ?
- [r6rs-discuss] Editorial change to 9.20 Macro transformers
- [r6rs-discuss] Editorial corrections to R5.92RS report
- [r6rs-discuss] Ellipses in procedure descriptions
- [r6rs-discuss] Enumerations
- [r6rs-discuss] equal? and infinite lists
- [r6rs-discuss] eqv? seems unwell
- [r6rs-discuss] Erratum to erratum
- [r6rs-discuss] Error in make-assertion-violation
- [r6rs-discuss] Error in phases note
- [r6rs-discuss] Errors in 9.1
- [r6rs-discuss] Expansion process
- [r6rs-discuss] export level exceptions
- [r6rs-discuss] expt and exactness
- [r6rs-discuss] Extending formal comment period
- [r6rs-discuss] final formal responses
- [r6rs-discuss] flonum operations?
- [r6rs-discuss] for-each example seems to be wrong
- [r6rs-discuss] Formal comment 61
- [r6rs-discuss] Formal Comments
- [r6rs-discuss] formal responses
- [r6rs-discuss] formal responses---second round
- [r6rs-discuss] formatting of all files
- [r6rs-discuss] formatting of PDF files
- [r6rs-discuss] fun with threads
- [r6rs-discuss] fxarithmetic-shift
- [r6rs-discuss] fxcopy-bit
- [r6rs-discuss] GUI papers [was: compilation and portability]
- [r6rs-discuss] hash-table-ref and default value
- [r6rs-discuss] Hashes in the number syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] hello.0.4.2.sls vs. hello-0.4.2.sls
- [r6rs-discuss] How about a "fold" procedure?
- [r6rs-discuss] How do I version a jpeg?
- [r6rs-discuss] HTML and LaTeX sources available
- [r6rs-discuss] I hereby reverse
- [r6rs-discuss] identifier-syntax templates
- [r6rs-discuss] immutable hash tables and eqv?
- [r6rs-discuss] Immutable record equivalence
- [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
- [r6rs-discuss] Importing set! into a single phase
- [r6rs-discuss] Inconsistent library names
- [r6rs-discuss] interpreters / pragmatics / lisp
- [r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?
- [r6rs-discuss] Is (syntax ...) allowed?
- [r6rs-discuss] Issues with section 8.2. Port I/O, a.k.a. (rnrs io ports (6))
- [r6rs-discuss] John Cowan's remaining formal comments
- [r6rs-discuss] Last minute questions
- [r6rs-discuss] Laziness Features
- [r6rs-discuss] Laziness Features - reentrancy
- [r6rs-discuss] Letrec* erratum
- [r6rs-discuss] letrec* vs. letrec
- [r6rs-discuss] Lexical syntax: unicode category "Co"
- [r6rs-discuss] Libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] Libraries and macros reference implementation update
- [r6rs-discuss] Libraries and syntax-case reference implementation update
- [r6rs-discuss] libraries are parameters (was set-car!)
- [r6rs-discuss] Libraries reference implementation update
- [r6rs-discuss] Libraries, scripts and programs
- [r6rs-discuss] Library naming ambiguity?
- [r6rs-discuss] Library version numbers
- [r6rs-discuss] library versions
- [r6rs-discuss] library versions (was: Rationale issues)
- [r6rs-discuss] line separators
- [r6rs-discuss] Linefeed and Line Endings
- [r6rs-discuss] List is subscribers-only -- please add note
- [r6rs-discuss] macroexpand
- [r6rs-discuss] mathematical foundations
- [r6rs-discuss] meta r6rs
- [r6rs-discuss] Minor 5.92 issues
- [r6rs-discuss] Minor error in (rnrs records syntactic) examples
- [r6rs-discuss] Minor formatting issue
- [r6rs-discuss] Mixed binary and ascii data in a single file
- [r6rs-discuss] More editorial corrections to R5.92RS report
- [r6rs-discuss] Multiple returns from higher-order procedures
- [r6rs-discuss] Multiple versions of a library in a program
- [r6rs-discuss] Names in let* bindings
- [r6rs-discuss] no, now, know
- [r6rs-discuss] Non-Normative Appendices
- [r6rs-discuss] on rational 6.7 Compund library names
- [r6rs-discuss] on rationale 2.1 Infinities, NaNs
- [r6rs-discuss] on rationale 6.8 [Library] Versioning
- [r6rs-discuss] on rationale 9.6 Characters and Strings
- [r6rs-discuss] One vote
- [r6rs-discuss] only 'big' and 'little' as endiannness may not be enough
- [r6rs-discuss] operational or denotational semantics?
- [r6rs-discuss] Panel on R6RS at the Scheme & FP workshop
- [r6rs-discuss] parent-rtd clauses in records
- [r6rs-discuss] past blast
- [r6rs-discuss] pdf file should have clickable links
- [r6rs-discuss] peculiar semantics for a predicate
- [r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....
- [r6rs-discuss] Plausible list problems
- [r6rs-discuss] PLT redex typesetting status?
- [r6rs-discuss] port-position and set-port-position!
- [r6rs-discuss] port/char/string alternative
- [r6rs-discuss] possible implementation of true 0 & Inf within ieee 754 using signaling NaN's?
- [r6rs-discuss] Possible overlook
- [r6rs-discuss] Problem with SYNTAX specification
- [r6rs-discuss] Problems with EVAL
- [r6rs-discuss] Problems with import syntax
- [r6rs-discuss] Programs and scripts
- [r6rs-discuss] Promises and Multiple Values
- [r6rs-discuss] Proposed Ratification Procedure for R6RS
- [r6rs-discuss] put-datum
- [r6rs-discuss] put-datum, get-datum, equal?, eqv?, and NaNs
- [r6rs-discuss] Python developer comments on Unicode
- [r6rs-discuss] query
- [r6rs-discuss] Question about "expand time" vs. "execution time"
- [r6rs-discuss] Question about fold-* procedures ?
- [r6rs-discuss] Question about transcoded-port
- [r6rs-discuss] Question on buffer modes
- [r6rs-discuss] questions for Unicode gurus
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.92RS
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.92RS draft
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.93RS
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.93RS draft May 22
- [r6rs-discuss] r5.94rs posted
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.95 questions
- [r6rs-discuss] r5.95rs posted
- [r6rs-discuss] r5.96rs posted
- [r6rs-discuss] R5.97RS---adoption candidate---posted
- [r6rs-discuss] R5RS environments
- [r6rs-discuss] R6 counterproposal
- [r6rs-discuss] R6RS insanity check (was square brackets etc)
- [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is 'perfect'
- [r6rs-discuss] r6rs is perfect
- [r6rs-discuss] R6RS mail archives, formal comments, next r6rs draft
- [r6rs-discuss] R6RS marketing
- [r6rs-discuss] R6RS size...
- [r6rs-discuss] r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 11, Issue 13
- [r6rs-discuss] r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1
- [r6rs-discuss] Raise-continuable and raise question
- [r6rs-discuss] Rationale issues
- [r6rs-discuss] reading XML files
- [r6rs-discuss] real->single and real->double
- [r6rs-discuss] Record Types
- [r6rs-discuss] Records simplification/question
- [r6rs-discuss] Recursively immutable objects and shared-nothing primitives?
- [r6rs-discuss] Reference implementation online
- [r6rs-discuss] reflecting on compilation
- [r6rs-discuss] Remaining inconsistencies: libraries and macros
- [r6rs-discuss] Removing version from examples
- [r6rs-discuss] request for html version
- [r6rs-discuss] Request for opening archive
- [r6rs-discuss] required explanations
- [r6rs-discuss] response to formal comment 8 [equality predicates and NaN]
- [r6rs-discuss] Restriction on srpattern should be dropped
- [r6rs-discuss] Results?
- [r6rs-discuss] reverse engineering a philosophy: portability
- [r6rs-discuss] S-expression comments not nestable
- [r6rs-discuss] Scheme should not be changed to be case sensitive
- [r6rs-discuss] Script exit code
- [r6rs-discuss] Semicolon seems a poor choice to end inline hex escapes
- [r6rs-discuss] set! cannot be imported just for RUN
- [r6rs-discuss] set-car!
- [r6rs-discuss] Sharp questions and things like bytevectors
- [r6rs-discuss] shift toward compilers (was Multiple returns from higher-order procedures)
- [r6rs-discuss] Shouldn't it be (rrs)?
- [r6rs-discuss] Small error in records example
- [r6rs-discuss] Small order issue
- [r6rs-discuss] small, last-minute fixes
- [r6rs-discuss] Spec Size and Numeric Tower
- [r6rs-discuss] Square brackets idea
- [r6rs-discuss] Standard GUI Library
- [r6rs-discuss] Standard Libraries: small editorial improvements
- [r6rs-discuss] Standard Libraries: Table of Contents and Summary
- [r6rs-discuss] Standard procedures for sorting
- [r6rs-discuss] Stateful codecs and inefficient transcoding
- [r6rs-discuss] Strange Grammar, 7.1 description of <library body>
- [r6rs-discuss] straw poll: case sensitivity
- [r6rs-discuss] string->utfX and utfX-string questions
- [r6rs-discuss] string-fill!
- [r6rs-discuss] Strings
- [r6rs-discuss] Strings as codepoint-vectors: bad
- [r6rs-discuss] strings based on buffers and markers
- [r6rs-discuss] syntax-rules at meta 0
- [r6rs-discuss] Tail contexts/invocations incompletely specified
- [r6rs-discuss] Testing
- [r6rs-discuss] Testing #2
- [r6rs-discuss] Testing #3
- [r6rs-discuss] The definition of flonum is in the wrong place
- [r6rs-discuss] The library name "rnrs" is overly precious
- [r6rs-discuss] The Rise of Worse is Better
- [r6rs-discuss] things that suck
- [r6rs-discuss] thinko in spec of fxcopy-bit-field
- [r6rs-discuss] to the Steering Committee: from Editors to Observers
- [r6rs-discuss] Transformer errors
- [r6rs-discuss] trivial r5.97rs formatting issue
- [r6rs-discuss] Trivial typo
- [r6rs-discuss] truncated essay on langu
- [r6rs-discuss] Tweak to the description of eqv? on constants
- [r6rs-discuss] Two questions about writing inexact numbers
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo in 5.94
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo in Appendix C
- [r6rs-discuss] typo in draft 5.92
- [r6rs-discuss] typo in fl=? examples
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo in Libraries, Ch 12, Sec 8
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo in Libraries, Ch 3
- [r6rs-discuss] typo in sec. 1.9
- [r6rs-discuss] typo in spec of fxbit-count
- [r6rs-discuss] typo on page 30
- [r6rs-discuss] typo on page 35
- [r6rs-discuss] typo on page 35, 36, and 37
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo on page 39
- [r6rs-discuss] Typo, sec 1.8 (32=>42)
- [r6rs-discuss] Typos
- [r6rs-discuss] Typos etc.
- [r6rs-discuss] Typos in 5.97 base report
- [r6rs-discuss] Typos in pages 24,25 of r6rs-lib
- [r6rs-discuss] unicode (re comment #134)
- [r6rs-discuss] Unicode in Scheme identifiers
- [r6rs-discuss] Unicode issues
- [r6rs-discuss] Unicode version
- [r6rs-discuss] Unplugging my formal comments
- [r6rs-discuss] Use backquote in "case"
- [r6rs-discuss] use of "bytes"
- [r6rs-discuss] Various typographical errors
- [r6rs-discuss] vectors of unsigned octets
- [r6rs-discuss] Version reference ambiguity
- [r6rs-discuss] Versioned standard libraries
- [r6rs-discuss] Versions should have decimal point
- [r6rs-discuss] Voter registration for the ratification vote is now open.
- [r6rs-discuss] WdW and the nature of Scheme (Was: A guideline for designing Scheme)
- [r6rs-discuss] What does the "new" procedure in the procedural records library do?
- [r6rs-discuss] What is a reference? (was Remaining inconsistencies...)
- [r6rs-discuss] What's up with the library names?
- [r6rs-discuss] whatever Scheme is
- [r6rs-discuss] Why are fx+ and fx* restricted to two arguments
- [r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?
- [r6rs-discuss] Why does begin not have a body?
- [r6rs-discuss] why is there no string-map function?
- [r6rs-discuss] Why lexers can be simpler when restricted to ASCII
- [r6rs-discuss] XML line endings
- A guideline for designing Scheme
- Allow compilers to reject obvious violations
- Comment 111: Syntax-rules
- exactness and complex numbers
- fun with threads
- Fwd: [r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"
- hash-table-hash-function should return a function
- Interpreters need not apply?
- operational or denotational semantics?
- Plausible list problems
- Programs and scripts
- R6RS size...
- r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 2, Issue 8
- r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 3, Issue 70
- r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 6, Issue 39
- r6rs-discuss Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1)
- The conundrums
- Last message date: Wed Oct 31 2007 - 13:34:29 UTC
- Archived on: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:02 UTC