[r6rs-discuss] required explanations
>
> Even if the creation of a standard should be a "democratic" process
> (and I'm not at all convinced about that), then complaining about it
> after the results are out is the wrong time. The Steering Committee
> _did_ call for comments about the ratification procedure, and any
> objections should have been voiced then.
>
Precisely because I was aware that the whole process is not bound to
be democratic, at least not in the sense of 'grassroots democracy', I
haven't complained before. However, I see absolutely no reason why I
shouldn't voice my objections at any time. It was a mistake on my
behalf not to have complained earlier, but that doesn't mean I need
to keep my mouth shut now, does it?
Perhaps the "Steering Committee" for R7RS can learn from previous
mistakes.
Cheers,
Erich
Received on Fri Aug 17 2007 - 09:09:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC