John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:
> Michael Sperber scripsit:
>
>> Does "line for flushing upon line endings or other
>> implementation-defined separators and reading up to line endings or
>> other implementation-defined separators" work?
>
> I'd rather go for "line for flushing upon line endings and reading up
> to line endings, or other implementation-dependent behavior. On some
> ports there simply will be no concept of a line ending; in other cases
> variable-sized buffering will be no more efficient than no buffering; in
> still other cases it will be impractical to change hardwired underlying
> assumptions like "line mode = LF only".
Will do. Thanks!
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Wed Aug 29 2007 - 02:15:39 UTC