"R. Kent Dybvig" <dyb_at_cs.indiana.edu> writes:
> So you directly contradicted yourself from one note to the next.
I missed that, obviously. Could you clarify?
> I've read that section several times without getting much out of it, but
> nothing I see there applies to the parameter mechanism.
Don't Chez's parameters provide the kind of thread-local storage the
paper talks about? (I'm really not sure at this point.)
> To replace parameters with your restricted construct, one need only
> define your value-binding construct in terms of parameters and use
> it in place of parameters.
That's not enough for your particular API, as you can't take away
mutation from an existing, provided parameter.
> Okay, but where's the definition of parameterize in terms of your
> dynamic binding construct? It didn't make it into your note.
I was assuming I'd use your definition unchanged.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 10:31:54 UTC