[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] eq?/eqv? misbehave around NaNs

From: Alan Watson <alan>
Date: Fri Nov 24 17:50:08 2006

Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> Alan Watson <alan_at_alan-watson.org> writes:
>
>
>>No. Consider an implementation has multiple versions of, say,
>>symbols, arranges from them to be eq? and eqv?, and also provides
>>a non-standard means to distinguish them. Symbols with the same
>>spelling have to be eq?, but these symbols are indeed "treated
>>differently" by other (non-standard) functions.
>
>
> IMHO it should not do this.

Can you tell me which part of the standard (draft R6RS or R5RS) forbids
this behaviour?

Regards,

Alan
Received on Fri Nov 24 2006 - 17:49:36 UTC