[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Equivalence predicate version of memp

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Wed Sep 27 16:58:36 2006

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, William D Clinger wrote:

> Andre van Tonder wrote:
>> Memp is unwieldy and potentially inefficient in the very common
>> case where one tests for membership is based on an equivalence predicate....
>
> ...
>
> Judging by those numbers, I don't think efficiency
> is a major issue here.

Thank you - this satisfactorily addresses what most bothered me.

Andre
Received on Wed Sep 27 2006 - 16:55:52 UTC