[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Implementation-specific declarations

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:52:18 +0200

John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> writes:

> Report section 4.5 speaks of "implementation-specific declarations",
> even though declarations have been gone since 5.91. Some other
> language should be chosen, such as "may provide non-conformant
> implementation modes that do not guarantee safety."

Fixed. Thanks!

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Fri Jun 08 2007 - 05:52:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC