[r6rs-discuss] Re: [Formal] eq?/eqv? misbehave around NaNs

From: Per Bothner <per>
Date: Thu Nov 23 14:20:59 2006

Michael Sperber wrote:
> I'll add an example:
>
> (eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0) => unspecified
>
> Will this address your concern?

Is there any scenario where you'd want anything other than:

(eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0) => #t

-- 
	--Per Bothner
per_at_bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

Received on Thu Nov 23 2006 - 14:21:56 UTC