> Rather than introducing novel "forall" and "exists" procedures, the
> "any" and "every" procedures of SRFI-1 should be adopted, along
> with the language of SRFI-1 describing them. SRFI-1 is a very
> successful list library and should be used as the basis for
> selective inclusion of new list-related features in R6RS.
I agree with this and with the map / for-each observations. Existing SRFI
functionality should be replicated as much as possible, and almost never
abrdged or contradicted. Existing code should be upgradable with the
minimum number of changes.
Dan Muresan
http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~muresan
Received on Fri Sep 22 2006 - 17:58:18 UTC