Andre van Tonder <andre_at_het.brown.edu> writes:
> Slight defect in plausible alist description.
>
> Description:
> ------------
>
> Point 1 does not check that (car x) is a pair as is done in point 3.
Could you elaborate on why it should? The first two items simply
codify that, even if n is 0, some minimal checking is done on the
alleged plausible alist. (Maybe I'm missing something trivial---this
stuff makes my head spin.)
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Tue Oct 24 2006 - 07:19:06 UTC