Alan Watson <alan at alan-watson.org> writes:
> If I mean "I want to be able to write a flonum on one implementation and
> guarantee (within range restrictions) that it will be read as a flonum
> on any other implementation", then I need to be able to write a flonum
> using an e exponent and no explicit mantissa precision. I do not think
> the standard gives me an easy way to do this. I believe I have to write
> my own number->string (possibly on top of the standard version).
I believe you're right.
> Question: Is flonum? a "standard arithmetic procedure"?
Yes.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Tue May 29 2007 - 09:40:10 UTC