[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Rename named `let'

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Thu Jan 25 16:09:58 2007

Michael Sperber scripsit:

> However, it would be much
> better to rename named `let' to something else such as `rec', `recur'
> or `recursive'.

Or even better, "loop".

> As this would break many existing Scheme programs, the report might
> introduce the separate form, and, to ease the transition, keep named
> `let' for now, either putting it into a separate library alongside
> (r6rs mutable-pairs) or at least marking it as deprecated and likely
> to disappear in a future revision of the report.

+1

-- 
Eric Raymond is the Margaret Mead               John Cowan
of the Open Source movement.                    cowan_at_ccil.org
        --Bruce Perens,                         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
          some years ago
Received on Thu Jan 25 2007 - 16:09:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC