Michael Sperber scripsit:
> Nice try! However, parameters are neither simple nor general.
> Moreover, the particular design you chose is problematic because it
> destroys modularity. In contrast, dynamic binding as a separate
> mechanism is simple and modular. Combined with thread-local storage
> (less simple and not modular, but still simpler than parameters), you
> can build parameters.
Nice try. But thread-local storage requires threads, which are out of
scope for R6RS.
Can you give an example of the kind of dynamic binding you mean?
--
When I'm stuck in something boring John Cowan
where reading would be impossible or (who loves Asimov too)
rude, I often set up math problems for cowan_at_ccil.org
myself and solve them as a way to pass http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the time. --John Jenkins
Received on Tue Feb 20 2007 - 15:24:43 UTC