[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] forall should be for-all for consistency with for-each

From: Arthur A.Gleckler <arthur>
Date: Tue Nov 14 12:30:18 2006

---
This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html
---
Name: Arthur A. Gleckler
Email: r6rs at speechcode.com
Type: defect
Priority: minor
Component: Libraries (List utilities)
Version: 5.91
In <12. List utilities>, please change the name of forall to for- 
all.  This is consistent with for-each, and "forall" is not an  
English word in any case.
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 00:18:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:00 UTC