[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Inappropriate number of values should be defined

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Mon Jan 29 07:39:51 2007

John Cowan <cowan_at_ccil.org> writes:

> Michael Sperber scripsit:
>
>> It's in Section 9.17:
>>
>> >> The continuations of all non-final expressions within a sequence of
>> >> expressions in lambda, begin, let, let*, letrec, letrec*,
>> >> let-values, let*-values, case, cond, and do forms as well as the
>> >> continuations of the before and after arguments to dynamic-wind take
>> >> an arbitrary number of values.
>
> Excellent. I suggest that a cross-reference be added to "values", then,
> because the language there is unequivocal and wrong.

I'm confused. This *is* in the spec for `value', in the second
paragraph. Could you elaborate on what you mean by "the language
there"?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Mon Jan 29 2007 - 07:39:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC