[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Inappropriate number of values should be defined

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Wed Jan 24 19:46:55 2007

Michael Sperber scripsit:

> It's in Section 9.17:
>
> >> The continuations of all non-final expressions within a sequence of
> >> expressions in lambda, begin, let, let*, letrec, letrec*,
> >> let-values, let*-values, case, cond, and do forms as well as the
> >> continuations of the before and after arguments to dynamic-wind take
> >> an arbitrary number of values.

Excellent. I suggest that a cross-reference be added to "values", then,
because the language there is unequivocal and wrong.

-- 
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML      John Cowan
Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker       cowan_at_ccil.org
saying "No information items inside".           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Eve Maler
Received on Wed Jan 24 2007 - 19:46:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC