[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Replacing the import's "for" syntax with implicit phasing

From: Abdulaziz Ghuloum <aghuloum>
Date: Fri Nov 17 10:01:57 2006

On Nov 17, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:

> This is incorrect. Visiting F is necessary to determine what bindings
> F
> provides. For example, if F is:

No. F is already expanded and compiled. I don't care about its source.

Aziz,,,
Received on Fri Nov 17 2006 - 10:01:37 UTC