[r6rs-discuss] "Unspecified"

From: Robby Findler <robby>
Date: Mon Oct 2 11:43:26 2006

At Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:32:52 -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > You are correct. My intention was to write the following:
> >
> > (define (for-each/logging f l)
> > (for-each (lambda (v) (let ([w (f v)]) (display w) (newline) w)) l))
> >
> > which has the problem I was attempting to point out.
>
> In R5RS or draft R6RS the result of set-vector! is unspecified
> anyway, so the above display is undefined. So I don't think
> I understand your concern.

He's talking about standard practice.
Received on Mon Oct 02 2006 - 11:42:40 UTC