[r6rs-discuss] eqv? seems unwell

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:23:25 -0400

Alan Watson scripsit:

> "Moreover, if (eqv? obj1 obj2) returns #t, then obj1 and obj2 behave the
> same when passed as arguments to any procedure that can be written as a
> finite composition of Scheme???s standard procedures."

I think the problem can be removed by adding the words
"other than eq?" to the end.

-- 
John Cowan    http://ccil.org/~cowan    cowan at ccil.org
[T]here is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin.
Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his
theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose
in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may
have important survival value. --Ian Johnston

Received on Wed Jun 27 2007 - 19:23:25 UTC