[r6rs-discuss] eqv? seems unwell
John Cowan wrote:
> I think the problem can be removed by adding the words
> "other than eq?" to the end.
I agree.
I think there is also a problem with this part:
"Note: The eqv? procedure returning #t when obj1 and obj2 are number
objects does not imply that = would also return #t when called with obj1
and obj2 as arguments."
Unless I am very much mistaken, I think both instances of #t in this
statement should be #f.
Regards,
Alan
Received on Wed Jun 27 2007 - 20:03:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC