[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] Reduce over-specification as well as under-specification.

From: Andre van Tonder <andre>
Date: Thu Nov 16 12:37:30 2006

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Felix Klock wrote:

> Do you mean nest in the sense of:
>
> (let-syntax ((x (let-syntax ((y (syntax-rules () ...))) ...))) ...)

Correct.

> The former case is not expressible in portable R5RS, correct?

I believe offhand it is supposed to work in r5rs, but you will probably
be able to find someone who disagrees with that, and they may be right.

Cheers
Andre
Received on Thu Nov 16 2006 - 12:36:54 UTC