[r6rs-discuss] hello.0.4.2.sls vs. hello-0.4.2.sls

From: AndrevanTonder <andre>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:25:22 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Michael Sperber wrote:

> How so? Especially given that the "main name" may include a hyphen
> (and digits) as well.

That's a good point. Does

   foo.1.2.3.sls

correspond to

   (foo (1 2 3))
   (foo.1 (2 3))
   (foo.1.2 (3))
   (foo.1.2.3 ()) ?

Hyphens would have the same problem. So the mapping defined
in the appendix would put additional constraints on library
naming.

Also, many source distributions would include toplevel programs.
Where should one put them?

Andre
Received on Thu Jun 28 2007 - 12:25:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC