[r6rs-discuss] hello.0.4.2.sls vs. hello-0.4.2.sls

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:42:48 +0200

AndrevanTonder <andre at het.brown.edu> writes:

> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Michael Sperber wrote:
>
>> How so? Especially given that the "main name" may include a hyphen
>> (and digits) as well.
>
> That's a good point. Does
>
> foo.1.2.3.sls
>
> correspond to
>
> (foo (1 2 3))
> (foo.1 (2 3))
> (foo.1.2 (3))
> (foo.1.2.3 ()) ?
>
> Hyphens would have the same problem. So the mapping defined
> in the appendix would put additional constraints on library
> naming.

That's right. And I'd rather have the constraints induced by using
. than the constraints induced by having -.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Thu Jun 28 2007 - 12:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC