[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] "Byte-vector" would be a better name than "bytes" for a data type.

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Tue Nov 14 14:51:03 2006

Eli Barzilay scripsit:

> * so `byte-string' is a better name, but then `character-' is implicit
> in one but not the other. Similar asymmetry to `length' vs
> `vector-length'.

This seems to be an argument in favor of "byte-string" rather than against it.

> * so `bytes' is a good compromise. (I use "byte strings" in text
> instead of "byteses".)

The fact that you do so is the best evidence that using "bytes" for a
singular object is a bad idea. Scheme programs *are* text -- highly
conventionalized, but text.

-- 
A rabbi whose congregation doesn't want         John Cowan
to drive him out of town isn't a rabbi,         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and a rabbi who lets them do it                 cowan_at_ccil.org
isn't a man.    --Jewish saying
Received on Tue Nov 14 2006 - 14:50:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:00 UTC