[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but....

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: MichaelL_at_frogware.com <MichaelL>
Date: Thu Mar 15 18:58:15 2007

> This presentation about the unicode support in SBCL also sais code
point.
>
http://www.doc.gold.ac.uk/~mas01cr/talks/2005-04-24%20Amsterdam/presentation.pdf
> The internal representation is an immediate bit, the character tag and
> the code point.

Yes, but if they're using UCS-4 then the size of a code point *is* the
size of a code unit.
Received on Thu Mar 15 2007 - 18:57:39 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Per Bothner: "[r6rs-discuss] [Formal] allow port position to be "magic cookie""
Previous message: Alexander Kjeldaas: "[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but...."
In reply to: Alexander Kjeldaas: "[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but...."
Next in thread: John Cowan: "[r6rs-discuss] perhaps i should be formal, but...."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC