[r6rs-discuss] Interpreters need not apply?

From: John Cowan <cowan>
Date: Wed Mar 7 11:56:26 2007

Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:

> I have 70000 lines of mathematical, scientific, engineering, database,
> and scripting software written in Scheme showing that R5RS is
> sufficient without syntax extensions. How much one-instruction
> assembly code have you written?

Diffidently I suggest that your code might have been substantially
shorter if it had made better use of the R5RS-provided mechanism
for syntactic abstraction.

"In anything at all, perfection is finally attained not when there is
no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take
away, when a body has been stripped down to its nakedness."
        --Antoine de St.-Exupery, "Wind, Sand, and Stars"

-- 
"But I am the real Strider, fortunately,"       John Cowan
he said, looking down at them with his face     cowan_at_ccil.org
softened by a sudden smile.  "I am Aragorn son  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
of Arathorn, and if by life or death I can
save you, I will."  --LotR Book I Chapter 10
Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 11:56:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC