--- This message is a formal comment which was submitted to formal-comment_at_r6rs.org, following the requirements described at: http://www.r6rs.org/process.html --- Name: Eli Barzilay Email: eli_at_barzilay.org Issue: Defect Priority: Trivial Component: Other (20.3. Delayed Evaluation) Version: 5.91 Summary: Minor "typos" in section 20.3 At the end of the `delay' description, there is a sentence that says: "See the description of `force' (section 20.3)" and there is a similar reference in `force' to the `delay' section. It's a little awkward to have references include the section number when the reference is to the next or previous paragraph. (I don't remember now if this happens elsewhere too.) Also, the sample implementation is still using a procedural value for no good reason, now that it is possible to make a new record type. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://www.barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!Received on Mon Oct 16 2006 - 02:57:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC