Eli Barzilay <eli_at_barzilay.org> writes:
> At the end of the `delay' description, there is a sentence that says:
> "See the description of `force' (section 20.3)" and there is a similar
> reference in `force' to the `delay' section. It's a little awkward to
> have references include the section number when the reference is to
> the next or previous paragraph.
Will do; thanks.
> (I don't remember now if this happens elsewhere too.)
It's possibly. There was a lot of shuffling around towards the end.
> Also, the sample implementation is still using a procedural value for
> no good reason, now that it is possible to make a new record type.
On the other hand (leaving aside the more general question of
improvements to promises discussed elsewhere), why would a new record
type be preferable?
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Sun Nov 26 2006 - 09:16:18 UTC