[r6rs-discuss] Why can ... and _ not be literals?

From: Michael Sperber <sperber>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:54:58 +0200

David Van Horn <dvanhorn at cs.brandeis.edu> writes:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, AndrevanTonder wrote:
>> There is in fact a trivial solution to porting legacy macros
>> using underscore. Simply put them in a library where you use
>>
>> (import (except (r6rs base) _))
>
> It is not clear to me that the current language in 9.20 implies this would
> work, but it would be nice if it did.

I would think this is clear, but I'd be happy to adopt a suggestion for
improvement.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla
Received on Tue Jun 26 2007 - 01:54:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Oct 23 2024 - 09:15:01 UTC